An Argument for Paying College Athletes

For quite some time now, there has been a big debatea piece of the pie too? This isn't to say that college
about whether or not college athletes should be paid.athletes should get paid large amounts of money, but it
Some people believe that a scholarship should bewould definitely be nice if their scholarships would pay
payment enough. After all, a scholarship can be easilythem a little extra to go out for pizza every once and
worth $15,000 - $25,000 or more per year, plus aa while, or buy some nice clothes - just a little extra
career after college that can be worth a million dollarsspending cash as a way of saying
over a lifetime. Additionally, student athletes receive all“thanks” for their efforts.
kinds of perks while they are in college, like staying atIf for some reason college athletes could be paid, that
fancy hotels, being seen on national tv, and all of theopens up a whole new can of worms. All of the
notoriety that goes with being a stare athlete. Its hardathletes on a football team with 125 players work very
to put a price tag on all of that.hard in practice, but only 11can start on offense and
However, considering the fact that certain collegedefense - do you only pay the starters?. Additionally, if
sports generate millions of dollars for college athleticyou were to pay more to the star quarterback than
programs, many people believe the athletes are beingyou do for an "ok" receiver, you are going
used. If the average football scholarship is worthto run into a lot of other problems. Having said this, the
$20,000 per year, yet the university gains $70,000 perfirst thing you want to avoid with paying college
year in revenue per scholarship player (please noteathletes is student athletes squabbling how much
that this figure is just an estimate - the actual numbermoney they earn or should earn, which happens
may actually be higher), the university will profit $50,000frequently in the NFL.
per year, per scholarship player, or $200,000 over aThe second thing you want to avoid is an uneven
four year period.playing field. While some colleges at the division I level
It is very difficult to put a numeric value on exactlycould afford to pay athletes, many simply don't bring in
how much an athlete is worth to a college. A starenough revenue. If a student athlete knows he can
quarterback will not only help sell tickets, but will bring inearn more at USC than he will if he plays for his state
plenty of merchandise sales as well. The NCCA won'tuniversity, then the playing field becomes more uneven
allow the universities to sell a college football jerseythan it already is. Athletes would almost always
with a player's name on it, but they will sell the jerseychoose the "money schools" over other
with the player's number on it, which is easilycolleges. Technically, this happens today more than
recognizable in local, and sometimes national markets.people realize, because colleges with the most tradition,
The major colleges earn enormous sums of money onbest coaches, and the best records are usually the
this kind of merchandise alone, yet the student athletecolleges with the most money…but, if one college
who's number is being used to sell merchandise will notcould afford to pay more to athletes than other
see one dime of the profits. To say that the studentcolleges, the playing field would be even more uneven.
athlete isn't being exploited in this situation is anIf you are going to start paying athletes, all of the
understatement.athletes need to be paid the same amount of money,
It goes way beyond that. College athletic programsand all of the colleges would need to have the same
rake in millions from television and advertising contracts.amount of money to pay their athletes with, which
They also bring in millions of dollars of donations fromcould be pre-determined by the NCAA. Even if this
sports boosters. Yes, salaries need to be paid toamount was a small amount like $1,000 PER YEAR,
athletic directors and coaches, not to mention travelper player (which totals ($125,000 per year for a
and other costs for the student athletes, and it is greatcollege football team with 125 players), paid every
that major college football and basketball programsmonth during the school year, it would be a lot more
help fund non-revenue athletic programs. However, thefair to the student athletes...and most colleges at the
fact of the matter is that, compared to the amount ofDivision I level could certainly afford it. For the few
revenue that student athletes generate for theircolleges that couldn't afford it, the NCAA could always
colleges, what they receive in return is very small.put up the extra money out of the millions it generates
Here's where it gets really interesting. An athlete canfrom the bowl game. Another alternative would be to
be "disciplined" for selling their tickets to acut the salaries of every executive of the NCAA who
fan on game day, yet how much money do thehas gotten rich off of NCAA athletics by 25%–
directors of the NCAA earn as a result of the effortsand give the difference to the athletes…
of the student athletes? The reality is that the collegeMost of this article focused on college football
athletes quite literally pay for a large portion of theprograms. The revenues that are generated from
salaries of every person employed by the NCAA. If anbasketball programs are even more staggering,
executive from the NCAA is able to drive aconsidering that the teams, are smaller, the travel
Mercedes, he can thank a star quarterback or runningexpenses are less expensive, and that fewer
back for that, and perhaps even several walk ons.scholarships need to be handed out, making the profits
So here is the point: if the NCAA, coaches, and athleticthat the NCAA earns from college basketball
directors can earn huge sums of money from theprograms even more staggering.
student athletes, shouldn’t student athletes have