Celebrity Perfumes - the Sweet Smell of Money

It seems that launching a signature scent has becomeGlow which has spurred celebrity perfumes on but
the norm as celebs expand their options and it's nothese days, they seem to be churning them out at an
wonder - who wouldn't want a slice of this multi-billionalarming rate. Mariah Carey is about to launch the
dollar industry? But don't be too quick to judge celebrityfollow up to 'M' with Mariah Carey's Luscious Pink and
perfumes. While many fail to impress beyond the initialJessica Simpson is releasing Fancy. In the UK, B-list
hype, some actually do stand the test of time. After all,celebrities are also getting in on the action. We've had
the proof is in the smelling and if you like a particularKerry Katona with Outrageous and Jade Goody has
fragrance, it doesn't really matter whose name isjust announced a follow up to her previous fragrance,
attached to it. Or does it?Shh… Jade Goody, with a new one called
Let's take Britney Spears and all her troubles as aControversial. Now is it just me or does it seem like
perfect example. Now I wouldn't normally go out of myfragrance manufacturers are simply working their way
way to try Britney's perfume but working as I do in thethrough the dictionary as they name these
industry means that I get to try perfumes irrespectivefragrances? To be fair though, as I said in the
of my personal preferences. And you know what, Ibeginning, the proof is in the smelling so I guess I'll just
actually quite like Britney's Curious (although I am partialhave to test these fragrances before passing
to almost any vanilla-based fragrance). I've triedjudgement.
introducing Curious to friends and although some ofSimilar to celebrity fragrance but slightly different is
them have liked it, they would never admit to wearingcelebrity endorsement. This is where a celebrity lends
a Britney perfume. So it just goes to show, celebrityhis or her face (and very often body) to a particular
endorsement doesn't always guarantee a winner.fragrance brand. This is a win-win situation for both the
Nevertheless, celebs know a money-spinner whenbrand (they retain branding of the product while still
they see one and continue to jump on the fragrancebenefiting from the celebrity's status and ability to sell)
bandwagon. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not sayingand the celebrity who gets money and much needed
that all celebrity perfumes are just about makingexposure. But this isn't always a win for the consumer
money without any real commitment to the product. Iand you have to wonder how many manufacturers
like to believe that some celebs do actually have anrely on celebrity endorsements to sell fragrances
interest and in some cases, even a personal say in thewhich would normally be seen as quite ordinary. A
creation of their fragrances. JLo for example (anotherrecent example would be Davidoff's Adventure which
of my favourite brands incidentally) makes quite a lotused Ewan "Long Way" McGregor as its face but
of the fact that each one of her fragranceswas panned by critics as being "anything but
represents an aspect of her own life and personalityadventurous". As with celebrity fragrances however,
and I for one believe her. Let's face it, in celebyou can't write off a fragrance simply because it has
fragrance terms, JLo is an experienced professional,celebrity endorsement and I for one am looking
having launched her first fragrance, Glow, back in 2002.forward to the release of Estée Lauder's Sensuous
But I think that she's the exception rather than the rulewhich, although promoted by no less than four celebs
and I think most celebs are happy to sprout the(Elizabeth Hurley, Carolyn Murphy, Hilary Rhoda and
marketing blurb that's been written for them.Gwyneth Paltrow) promises to be Estée Lauder's
I'm sure it's the success of fragrances like JLo's Miamimost exciting release in recent years.