Commercialization Of Sports

The commercialization of sports is that aspect of thethe early part of the 20th century 98 percent of the
sports enterprise that involves the sale, display, or useGames' amateur competitors made no money from
of sport or some aspect of sport so as to producetheir participation. In contrast, today's Olympic athletes
income. Some experts prefer the termare far from amateurs. The International Olympic
"commodification of sport" as a label for the sameCommittee recognized the inevitable creep of
process. Interest in the commercialization of sport hascommercialism and professionalism, and instead of
existed for several decades,but only in recent yearsrequiring participants to be amateurs they merely ask
has the phenomenon has been taken seriously on athat participants have an "amateur spirit."
larger scale. The first attention came from a smallBenifits
group of critical, mostly leftist writers, who have nowIndia's biggest success in this concept is the IPL. With
been joined by people from all political and socialmillions of dollars being spent on players, management
perspectives.team, auctions, the cricket doesn't seem a sport any
The commercialization of sport is not a culturalmore. Its business. New deals being struck in every
universal, but a product of unique technical, social, andmatch, some with players, some with business mens
economic circumstances. Sports in the colonial Unitedand some with film stars. Profit making is the sole
States were usually unstructured, spontaneouspurpose in every game with no or very little nationalist
activities that the participants initiated, coordinated, andor regional fever involved.
managed. Only in the latter part of the 19th century didAt last it's not only that players gain from it. The sport
organized sport cross the ocean from Great Britainat whole are the gainers. Take for example the PHL
and arrive in America. At that time, urbanization forcedhockey, which has, risen from ashes, just like the bird
a large number of people to live in new settings and tophoenix. Commercialization of games infuse money
abandon traditional leisure activities, which includedinto these sports and its cash starved associations
drinking, carousing, and gambling.The dominant classwhich altogether lead to improvement in the game as
sought to replace them with activities such as baseball,a whole. More money means a career opportunity for
horseracing, and boxing.players and thus sports being more professional.
Gambling
ProfessionalismA rise in gambling on sporting events has been an
Professional sports, a big business that has grownindirect consequence of these phenomena.Great
rapidly over the last three decades, may be theBritain and Las Vegas permit some legal gambling.
epitome of commercialization, its influence pervasiveHowever, it is likely that more money is bet on sports
throughout. Athletes, support personnel (managers,illegally.According to McPherson, Americans lose an
coaches, officials, media persons, lawyers, and agents),estimated $200 million on sports bets annually.The link
and sports team owners benefit handsomely from thebetween sports and gambling is complex. For example,
willingness of sports fans to pay to watch theirthe profits from legalized gambling are often used to
favorite sports and to purchase the commoditiesbuild sports facilities and to operate many youth sports
endorsed by sports personalities. Hundreds ofprograms.
professional athletes earn well over $1 million a year.
Before 1977, $1 million contracts did not exist.By 1994Social Impact
there were well over 200 professional athletes whoHow does this commercialization affect the individual
earned salaries in excess of $1 million. In 1990, reportedand society? Proponents of modern sport argue that
average 1989 salaries for athletes in four differentcapitalist systems have made more sports available to
professional sports stood at $577,200 in the Nationalmore people. They contend, too, that the owners,
Basketball Association, $490,000 in the nationalproducers, and distributors of sports are simply
baseball leagues, $212,000 in the National Footballresponding to the demands of sports consumers.
League, and $156,000 in the National HockeyCritics of commercialization reject this view and argue
League.Forbes's 1994 list of the top-earning athletesthat in reality only a small segment of society—the
included basketball stars Michael Jordan at $30 millionwealthy—have access to many sports. In addition,
and Shaquille O'Neal at $17 million, golfers Jack Nicklaussome critics also argue that commercialization via
at $15 million and Arnold Palmer at $14 million, andtelevision especially has turned sport yet another form
boxers Micheal Moore and Evander Holyfield at $12of passive entertainment. In addition, it is argued that
million each. In most cases, athletes' endorsementscommercialized sports, when used to display social
make up over 90 percent of their earnings.status, effectively divides society. Finally, critics
Olympicscomplain that commercialized sport is another way of
The ideal of the modern Olympic Games stands indefining life in terms of the purchase price rather than
stark opposition to the commercialism of sports.an inner sense of meaning and achievement. Despite
However, many commentators have argued that thisthese criticisms, there is little doubt that sports
idealism has been compromised to the point that thecontinues to become more and more commercial and
Olympics is currently the epitome of commercialism. Inthe process is spreading to the non-Western world.