Executive Recruiting - Draft Your Corporate Executives Correctly

Everyone loves a good sports analogy. The upcomingin business. Without a business leaders Combine
NFL Draft prompted me to consider how the playerperformance and reels of film to review, we have to
selection process compares to how businessesrely on other measures to help determine a prospect's
succeed with executive recruiting. Because I'mpotential for success.
interested in how organizations assess a leader'sBut what can the NFL draft teach us about executive
capabilities and their subsequent success, I set out torecruiting for our business's top leaders?
determine whether the NFL can offer a few tips to1. Don't hire a wide-receiver to be your linebacker.
improve an organization's executive recruiting.A successful corporate and NFL leader has
A recent New York Times article about Harvardexperience and expertise doing specifically what you
Business School (HBS) research gave me the basisneed to have done. In the NFL, the large majority of
for a football and business comparison. The research,players play one position in college, perform at the
conducted to determine whether CEOs learn from aCombine in that same position and will attempt to
failed business experience, studied entrepreneursmake an NFL roster in the same position. The
CEOs who received venture capital (VC) funding.successful NFL franchises use caution to avoid
While a fun and timely comparison, there is a basicbecoming awe struck by the super athlete, for
similarity between venture capital firms and NFLexample Bo Jackson. It's interesting to note that
organizations. Both NFL teams as well as ventureJackson did not play in a single Pro Bowl game, and he
capital firms operate in a high risk and high rewardplayed in only one Baseball All-Star Game. NFL teams
environment where executive recruiting is a rigorousand the individual players know their individual role, their
exercise to minimize risk and maximize reward.specific strengths and weaknesses in that role and
The HBS research found that "...for the averagewhere their teammates need to support their
entrepreneur who failed, no learning happened." Whatdeficiency.
they found was that the only experience that counts isIn Corporate America's executive recruiting, the leader
success. HBS's definition of success was going publicyou hire should have industry knowledge and, based
or filing to go public during the time period from 1986 toon my NFL research, the executive should have
2003.recently played a similar role in a successful, previous
Research Findings:o 1st time entrepreneurial CEOsbusiness.
who received VC funding had a 22 percent success2. It's hard work to assess soft skills.
rate.o Entrepreneurs whose companies had beenI talked briefly with Titans' General Manager Mike
liquidated or gone bankrupt had a 23 percent follow onReinfeldt about this article and asked him whether soft
success rate. Take away: Failure resulted in only oneskills are important in determining which player the
percentage point of learning.o Already successfulTitans draft. He quickly stated, "Very important". Mr.
entrepreneurs had a 34 percent success rate in theirReinfeldt added that the draftee will be paid like a
future role of leading a VC funded business. Takeleader, looked upon as a leader and expected to be a
away: Greater learning gained from success.leader. How he communicates with the team, the
As I watched ESPN's Draft Review one evening, Melcoaches and the community is very important. Draft
Kiper, Jr. and others debated each NFL team'sprospects are interviewed by multiple people to
probable selections and who they believed were theassess fit within the organization and community, which
best available performers. Kiper pointed to anMr. Reinfeldt stated was equally important to the level
individual's performance on the field during the lastof athleticism.
three years, at the recent Combine and duringA business leader's soft skills and ability to be effective
workouts with NFL team scouts in discussing thewith investors and the board, senior management and
player's projected success in the NFL. Suddenly, it hitstaff, prospects and customers, policy and regulatory
me. Each NFL prospect goes through tremendousauthorities, vendors and those within the community
public scrutiny on specifics of his past and recentare vitally important in your executive recruiting
performances to determine the environments whereprocess and hiring the right leader.
the player would be most likely to succeed. I laughed3. The Heisman Trophy winner may not be the best
as I wondered; can NFL teams and the NFL draftleader.
teach VC firms how to improve executive recruitingOnly two of the eight Heisman Trophy winners
outcomes?selected from 1996 to 2003 have been named to a
I decided to compare business leaders to Top 10 NFLPro Bowl. An equally interesting comparison is that
draftees. Each year these Top 10 NFL draftees areduring the 1986-2003 time period, eight individuals who
the highest paid athletes, they are clearly world-classwere #1 draftees made at least one Pro Bowl while
performers and they are expected to provide teamseven individuals who were #10 Draftees made at
leadership. HBS researchers used 'going public' as theirleast one Pro Bowl. There is a dramatic perception
measure of success, and I decided to measure eachdifference and guaranteed income difference
of the NFL's Top 10 Draftee's success by beingbetween the Number 1 draft pick and the Number 10
named to the annual Pro Bowl. I used the same 1986 -draft pick; however; the significant income difference
2003 time period and needed to determine thedoes not correspond to results on the field.
percentage of Top 10 NFL draftees who achievedWhen a business experiences a vertical growth
Pro Bowl status. Additionally, I wanted to know whichtrajectory, it creates the perception that the company's
players among this draft group achieved follow-onleaders are truly world-class. As a result, we may rush
success, defined as being named to multiple Proto hire an individual from this company. While this
Bowls. The results of my research:o Top 10 NFLstrategy may lead to a great hire, do not let yourself
draftees who played in at least one Pro Bowl: 43get caught up in the excitement and conduct the
percento Of the Top 10 NFL draftees who played inexecutive recruiting process without proper and
at least one Pro Bowl, the percentage of these samethorough diligence.
Top 10 NFL draftees who played in more than oneIn Summary:
Pro Bowl: 73 percent.My light-hearted comparison was interesting to highlight
Venture capital firms successfully choose the righta few thoughts to consider when hiring a key
performer 22 percent of the time while NFL teamsexecutive. Companies do not follow business leaders
successfully chose the best performer 43 percent oflike the NFL follows prospects; nor do we interview
the time. Even more contrasting, those who succeedbusiness leaders like the NFL Combine. Top executive
with venture capital firms achieve a 32 percentrecruiting firms may be a very good resource to you
success rate in a follow-on attempt where NFLas they are supposed to know these business leaders
players who achieve one Pro Bowl have a 73 percentwell and possess knowledge of their past
success rate in being named to at least one additionalperformance. Additionally, a good executive recruiting
Pro Bowl. Some light research (loosely using the termfirm should also have the ability to thoroughly and
"research"), reveals that the NFL is twice as good inaccurately assess a prospect's relative fit within your
identifying top performers. Even more interesting is thatorganization and his/her performance ability. But once
the NFL teams that hire correctly end up pickingyour executive recruiting firm has identified, assessed
long-term performers. Again, performers who achieveand recommended top candidates for an executive
our definition of success, a Pro Bowl invitation, areposition, it's still important that the investors, board
more than 73 percent likely to have future success!members and senior leaders engage to assess both
Granted, the NFL's decision makers have resourcesthe hard and the soft skills of the top draft pick before
not available to venture capital firms and the rest of usadding him or her to the corporate roster.